Erasing Hell
I just read a book called “Erasing Hell.” It’s a standard, run-of-the-mill evangelical book with a sleek cover and a short read time.
Let me tell you: this book completely restored my confidence that I’ve made the right decision in rejecting this madness.
I would give this book to people in order to convince them of my point of view.
January 8, 2012 at 5:46 pm
Assuming one could have a conversation with an evangelical that would lead to the rejection of their faith, do you think it is ethical to do so? I feel like I should have a backup anchor for them when they realise that what kept them going is nonsense. I suppose I could just offer insights into what keeps me happy, but I’m less clear on that than I am on being non-Christian.
January 9, 2012 at 9:12 pm
I don’t like the word “ethics.” I’m used to using the word “moral” which means you’re *actually* right or wrong to do something (not just that I think you are).
But I guess I’m on shaky ground using it now, aren’t I.
I think (like many things) that it depends. I think that you should promote the truth–and all arguments that rely on valid facts promote truth, even if the interpretations are skewed–HOWEVER I do not believe in hurting people for no reason.
I see a lot of atheists attempting to shred the Christian faith on the Internet, and not only does this not work, it disturbs and troubles people. If I knew those atheists personally, I suspect that I could find words that would make them feel the same way, without telling any lies.
I believe in honesty and facts over emotions, but only when something is gained on the whole. I guess that’s really subjective.
If you’re asking whether there are people whose faith I would leave alone and say nothing about, for fear of hurting them (knowing that their faith certainly won’t get them punished in the afterlife, and is a positive feature of their life), the answers is: absolutely.
January 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm
Cool thanks, I agree with that policy.